Careers are generally lifelong, and so we would not expect dramatic shifts to have taken place among the community of professional musicians since his book was published. We also examine jazz audiences via the government’s 2016 Taking Part survey of cultural participation.Ĭhilton gives a rich picture of the history of British jazz careers - there is no better single source giving such detail on career histories for a large number of jazz musicians. Our new research paper combines analysis of John Chilton’s Who’s Who of British Jazz, an archive of career histories from 2004, with data on the recordings made by each of these musicians drawn from the continually updated Lord Discography. But what about the audiences? Are they helping to shape the sexism that is being reported in jazz? Interrogating the numbers Clearly, changes are still needed on the industry side. In recent years, we’ve seen extensive reporting about sexist assumptions in the jazz industry, as well as accounts of sexual harassment. It is likely, though, that some female musicians find the professional environment hostile. If women are not present in jazz, it is often assumed to be because they cannot play well enough, play the wrong instruments, or simply prefer other musical genres and the cultures around them. It’s a cliché that music is a meritocracy, in which success is seen to arise from a combination of talent and effort. Rather than there being explicit barriers to entry, scholarly attention has focused on gender differences in preferences and socialisation: men seeing concerts as a male space, and male musicians more likely to be encouraged to continue following early experience of playing with others – particularly in terms of learning improvisation and taking a solo from a young age. Recordings led by women formed only one-fifth of the top 50 albums NPR Music Jazz Critics Poll over 2017 to 2019, and this seems to be a long-term trend: a survey of British jazz musicians in 2004 suggested 14% were female. In the end, these celebrities exceeded everyone's expectations by dropping their best work yet.įrom Taylor Swift and Selena Gomez, to Demi Lovato and Kesha, here are 20 artists who took a hiatus and came back even stronger and more determined than ever.There are are relatively few female musicians in jazz. Since these stars' previous releases were so huge, fans wondered if their follow-up movies, television shows, or records would have the same impact. Fans were just so excited to see their faves back to work again, wondering what they were cooking up next. The hype leading up to their big comeback projects was unbelievable. While some actors and musicians' star status was never the same after stepping back from the public eye, these 20 artists who took a hiatus only found more success when they came back. Other times, they just need some time off in order to get inspired again. Sometimes, the fame can become too much, and that's why celebs need to get away from all the noise every once in a while. Not to mention, there's an endless amount of pressure to top their last project while online trolls hate on them for no reason. With so many eyes watching your every move, there's constant pressure to never make mistakes. After all, it's not easy living life in the spotlight. Celebrities need a break sometimes just like everybody else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |